<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Update</title>
	<link>http://www.layoutdesigns.com/archives/update-6/</link>
	<description>A selection of model railroad plans and designs that have been either designed exclusively for this site or have been reproduced by the kind permission of the designers.  Click on any plan or photo for an enlargement.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 06:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.layoutdesigns.com/archives/update-6/#comment-28554</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 18:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.layoutdesigns.com/archives/update-6/#comment-28554</guid>
					<description>Hello Stuart,

I am very enthusiastic about your Big Foot Lumber lay-out. I am an avid player of the Trainz RR simulator and I would really like to re-build your lay-out in the simulator. I would appreciate it if you could give me permission to build it. ( erikkegge AT gmail DOT com ).

Thank you in advance,

Regards,
Erik</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Stuart,</p>
<p>I am very enthusiastic about your Big Foot Lumber lay-out. I am an avid player of the Trainz RR simulator and I would really like to re-build your lay-out in the simulator. I would appreciate it if you could give me permission to build it. ( erikkegge AT gmail DOT com ).</p>
<p>Thank you in advance,</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Erik
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.layoutdesigns.com/archives/update-6/#comment-27728</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 05:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.layoutdesigns.com/archives/update-6/#comment-27728</guid>
					<description>Thanks for leaving these designs on the site.

There are some good ideas and tips here regardless of lack of updates.

cheers

Stuart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for leaving these designs on the site.</p>
<p>There are some good ideas and tips here regardless of lack of updates.</p>
<p>cheers</p>
<p>Stuart
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jim Thompson</title>
		<link>http://www.layoutdesigns.com/archives/update-6/#comment-27237</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 12:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.layoutdesigns.com/archives/update-6/#comment-27237</guid>
					<description>Note to Tom Baxter (and others re: "Traversers/Transfer Tables"): Carl Arendt has a short FAQ in his Articles Section (carendt.com) with some links to other inexpensive option for construction. (It is a good start anyway)

I seem to remember [from 1,000 years ago? :-)] that Model railroader had an article about a fellow who used one interior door, plus 1/2, to create an 'L' shaped layout in 027 gauge! I thought that was a great use and gives hope to the rest of us.

The biggest complaint I have encountered is running lo-o-o-ong passenger cars and the "unusual" overhang on shorter radius curves. Oh well...I run Marklin M-Track Industry Radius curves [22" (approx) radius] as my main line , but then I just run short stock with short tank engines. But I am a happy boy. My layout is basically over-under in 2'x6'. And with a pair of switches sandwiched in, I have an Inglenook game. It might be different if I had a barn...LOL!

Surprisingly (or not!) I find something here that I missed the last time through, so let us keep on keepin' on!

Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note to Tom Baxter (and others re: &#8220;Traversers/Transfer Tables&#8221;): Carl Arendt has a short FAQ in his Articles Section (carendt.com) with some links to other inexpensive option for construction. (It is a good start anyway)</p>
<p>I seem to remember [from 1,000 years ago? <img src='http://www.layoutdesigns.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> ] that Model railroader had an article about a fellow who used one interior door, plus 1/2, to create an &#8216;L&#8217; shaped layout in 027 gauge! I thought that was a great use and gives hope to the rest of us.</p>
<p>The biggest complaint I have encountered is running lo-o-o-ong passenger cars and the &#8220;unusual&#8221; overhang on shorter radius curves. Oh well&#8230;I run Marklin M-Track Industry Radius curves [22&#8243; (approx) radius] as my main line , but then I just run short stock with short tank engines. But I am a happy boy. My layout is basically over-under in 2&#8242;x6&#8242;. And with a pair of switches sandwiched in, I have an Inglenook game. It might be different if I had a barn&#8230;LOL!</p>
<p>Surprisingly (or not!) I find something here that I missed the last time through, so let us keep on keepin&#8217; on!</p>
<p>Jim
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Wombat</title>
		<link>http://www.layoutdesigns.com/archives/update-6/#comment-20455</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.layoutdesigns.com/archives/update-6/#comment-20455</guid>
					<description>Where is the comeback?
Like to see the updates as I am looking for a layout to start</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where is the comeback?<br />
Like to see the updates as I am looking for a layout to start
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Glenn Hazel</title>
		<link>http://www.layoutdesigns.com/archives/update-6/#comment-14683</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 21:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.layoutdesigns.com/archives/update-6/#comment-14683</guid>
					<description>Traffic seems to be low all over. I hope it is because modelers have put away the keyboards and picked up the hobby knife.

Although he internet is a wonderful thing, it can be time consuming. Personally I spend 30 minutes a day surfing eBay for MRR items. I have set up specific searches and for awhile had the results emailed to me. I found it quicker to go on with my morning coffee.

Tahta's another time consumer email, more specifically email groups like Yahoo. I checked my group email for the first time in two weeks. I had over 157 legitimate emails, not spam. And I only get mail from five of the 20 groups I belong to. I read about 3/4 of them.

I have drastically cut down my online time. Unfortuneately the savings has been consumed by two kids erolled in Philadelphia colleges. They commute. The station is about a 35 minute round trip twice a day. The enjoyable part is I get to see the Acela and Metroliners flyby and I cross over the old B&#38;O main on the way.

I have noted over the past year online activity runs in spurts. Some groups are more active at certain times of the year than others. Some groups lay dormant then experience a short rebirth.

Carl Arendt's micro layout site grew quickly but appears to dormant. Yes he has bi-monthy updates, but when was the last new layout added. We may have burned out in that department or gleefully built some layouts. The latter must be the case for the Scrapbook to become bi-monthly.

What we don't see hear, hopefully is being spent on other hobby stuff.

Glenn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traffic seems to be low all over. I hope it is because modelers have put away the keyboards and picked up the hobby knife.</p>
<p>Although he internet is a wonderful thing, it can be time consuming. Personally I spend 30 minutes a day surfing eBay for MRR items. I have set up specific searches and for awhile had the results emailed to me. I found it quicker to go on with my morning coffee.</p>
<p>Tahta&#8217;s another time consumer email, more specifically email groups like Yahoo. I checked my group email for the first time in two weeks. I had over 157 legitimate emails, not spam. And I only get mail from five of the 20 groups I belong to. I read about 3/4 of them.</p>
<p>I have drastically cut down my online time. Unfortuneately the savings has been consumed by two kids erolled in Philadelphia colleges. They commute. The station is about a 35 minute round trip twice a day. The enjoyable part is I get to see the Acela and Metroliners flyby and I cross over the old B&amp;O main on the way.</p>
<p>I have noted over the past year online activity runs in spurts. Some groups are more active at certain times of the year than others. Some groups lay dormant then experience a short rebirth.</p>
<p>Carl Arendt&#8217;s micro layout site grew quickly but appears to dormant. Yes he has bi-monthy updates, but when was the last new layout added. We may have burned out in that department or gleefully built some layouts. The latter must be the case for the Scrapbook to become bi-monthly.</p>
<p>What we don&#8217;t see hear, hopefully is being spent on other hobby stuff.</p>
<p>Glenn
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Vanse</title>
		<link>http://www.layoutdesigns.com/archives/update-6/#comment-2207</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.layoutdesigns.com/archives/update-6/#comment-2207</guid>
					<description>Thought you said Emrys that this site was making a comeback! That post was dated 2005 !

Would love to see this great stuff on layouts updated.

Go for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought you said Emrys that this site was making a comeback! That post was dated 2005 !</p>
<p>Would love to see this great stuff on layouts updated.</p>
<p>Go for it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tom Baxter</title>
		<link>http://www.layoutdesigns.com/archives/update-6/#comment-679</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.layoutdesigns.com/archives/update-6/#comment-679</guid>
					<description>GREAT! Another site of clever plans for the space starved. The question is; how small can a layout become before the `operational' side of the plan becomes compromised by the lack of space? My guess is that the `A3 Challange' -sized baseboard is about the limit before you are just limited to shuttling locos back and forth. That being said, i`m in the process of building one that features 3 points, a mine, tippler and loco shed in Hoe! When it`s built i`ll send some pictures if you`re intrersted.  I`ve also planned (but not yet built) a `pointless' inglenook, fed by a traverser in N which i reckon can be built in about 18" x 4". The only problem being my inability to construct the traverser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GREAT! Another site of clever plans for the space starved. The question is; how small can a layout become before the `operational&#8217; side of the plan becomes compromised by the lack of space? My guess is that the `A3 Challange&#8217; -sized baseboard is about the limit before you are just limited to shuttling locos back and forth. That being said, i`m in the process of building one that features 3 points, a mine, tippler and loco shed in Hoe! When it`s built i`ll send some pictures if you`re intrersted.  I`ve also planned (but not yet built) a `pointless&#8217; inglenook, fed by a traverser in N which i reckon can be built in about 18&#8243; x 4&#8243;. The only problem being my inability to construct the traverser.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John Humes</title>
		<link>http://www.layoutdesigns.com/archives/update-6/#comment-677</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 04:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.layoutdesigns.com/archives/update-6/#comment-677</guid>
					<description>WOW!  The comments from Glenn Hazel are of great interest to me.  Good thinking Glenn.

I am currently buildling a modified version of the Snowshoe.

To save space in the bottom yard I have a used a Peco 3 way turnout.  I am also using 15" R curves.  All flex track from Peco

The locos of couse need to be small.  The critter from Roundhouse is great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW!  The comments from Glenn Hazel are of great interest to me.  Good thinking Glenn.</p>
<p>I am currently buildling a modified version of the Snowshoe.</p>
<p>To save space in the bottom yard I have a used a Peco 3 way turnout.  I am also using 15&#8243; R curves.  All flex track from Peco</p>
<p>The locos of couse need to be small.  The critter from Roundhouse is great.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Glenn Hazel</title>
		<link>http://www.layoutdesigns.com/archives/update-6/#comment-536</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 13:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.layoutdesigns.com/archives/update-6/#comment-536</guid>
					<description>Toni Helm gave me a great idea, a bookcase layout. Many bookcases have several adjustable shelves. Being adjustable means they are also removeable to build a sectional layout. The shelves can be laid end to end in any order on a table or other support. With a small enough radius there could also be corners. 

The bookcase provides storage and display. Shelves should be sceniked to be seen from both side so when stored the viewers can see different scenes. A fixed shelf could be used to store trains when not in use.

There goes a excuse for not having a layout: where to store it. (I am my own worst enemy)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toni Helm gave me a great idea, a bookcase layout. Many bookcases have several adjustable shelves. Being adjustable means they are also removeable to build a sectional layout. The shelves can be laid end to end in any order on a table or other support. With a small enough radius there could also be corners. </p>
<p>The bookcase provides storage and display. Shelves should be sceniked to be seen from both side so when stored the viewers can see different scenes. A fixed shelf could be used to store trains when not in use.</p>
<p>There goes a excuse for not having a layout: where to store it. (I am my own worst enemy)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Toni Helm</title>
		<link>http://www.layoutdesigns.com/archives/update-6/#comment-26</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.layoutdesigns.com/archives/update-6/#comment-26</guid>
					<description>I just discovered this website and I must say it looks very nice. The comment posting comes in very handy.

I'm also working on a layout. It's a shelf layout on an IKEA shelf from the BILLY series based on a narrow gauge passenger line. It's in Japanese style. In a few weeks I will update my site with some pictures on the progress etc.

Good luck with your layout!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just discovered this website and I must say it looks very nice. The comment posting comes in very handy.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also working on a layout. It&#8217;s a shelf layout on an IKEA shelf from the BILLY series based on a narrow gauge passenger line. It&#8217;s in Japanese style. In a few weeks I will update my site with some pictures on the progress etc.</p>
<p>Good luck with your layout!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
